17A - Elevator Pitch No.2

-

Reflection
I didn’t receive written feedback but I asked some friends of what they thought of it, and they mentioned that I spoke entirely too fast and it was too long they couldn’t finish concentrating on it. They barely were able to recite what I had said because they couldn’t really focus on my words and how it connected overall. 

What I changed
I changed my speed and cut it down to actually only be 90 seconds. I realized in the first one I did, I put a lot of unnecessary information that ended up boring the audience. The statistics I used for this one are a lot more direct and correlates to why my business should be preferred. I changed the angle of the camera and how I moved around.

Comments

  1. UnknownOctober 28, 2019 at 7:37 AM

    Giovanna, I was in the same boat where I did not receive much feedback from my peers but was able to gain knowledge of my video from others. I am glad you were able to see where you needed improvement and make the necessary adjustments. Changing the angle of your video can make a really big difference when it comes to how the video looks on camera. Thanks for sharing, good job!

    ReplyDelete
  2. Rebekah SmithOctober 28, 2019 at 7:46 AM

    Giovanna, I was in the same boat where I did not receive much feedback from my peers but was able to gain knowledge of my video from others. I am glad you were able to see where you needed improvement and make the necessary adjustments. Changing the angle of your video can make a really big difference when it comes to how the video looks on camera. Thanks for sharing, good job!

    ReplyDelete
  3. Mya L.October 28, 2019 at 8:04 PM

    Hey Giovanna, I enjoyed watching your pitch. I was very knowledgable, clear, and concise. I enjoyed seeing in your reflection that you were able to find outside sources to help improve your pitch from before. Great job!

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

9A – Testing the Hypothesis, Part 2

-
Who: Through my interviews I found a group of people that could fall outside the scope of my market. First it is people who don’t have thorough knowledge of sustainable architecture, and the second is people who don’t have the budget for it. Interviewer #2 from Fort. Lauderdale stated that he would only invest in something he knows would have a big impact, and he believes that sustainable architecture has very little impact. They fall outside the scope. In my interview #3 AND #4 stated that they would absolutely invest in sustainable architecture, but budget limits them. They would fall into the opportunity, but they have a limiting factor.  What: My need differs from other needs in the sense that it is still architecture and people have the need to build buildings, and so why not make it sustainable. Interviewer #5 said that if she easily found a sustainable architect that she liked and was not pricey she would go for it. So what I am gathering is that this opportunity is mor...
Read more

23A – Your Venture’s Unfair Advantage

-
Fundraising Abilities: increase capital, in the larger scope of things it will involve maybe dealing with loans, but fundraising helps understand logistics of amount of money needed. Valuable: I need money for my project. It is large scale, and requires money to get money. Rare: Not super rare, a lot of people have fundraised in their lives. Inimitable: many people have done, but it takes a lot of will and energy to fundraise a lot. Non-Substitutable: could substitute somewhat with loans Technological Connections: keep innovation up, so I create an always growing product Valuable: super, don’t want to lag Rare: not super rare, but my team would be loyal to me Inimitable: sure, but still a loyal team is crucial for these connections to reap benefits. Non-Substitutable: I can’t think of something that would substitute the knowledge of technology (that I don’t have) Environmental Awareness + Connections: will provide new knowledge on the area Valuable: it is the ...
Read more

8A - Solving the Problem

-
Image
My product is to provide more sustainable alternatives to commonplace products to reduce climate change effects. My solution to decrease climate change is to have products and architecture with lower carbon emissions. This could be applied to governments, corporations, smaller businesses, and the common person; so everyone. The level of importance differs between the different sectors because of scalability (governments and big corporations could naturally have a larger impact by switching to sustainable buildings and products). Different solutions/products: From my interviews I found that the first important step to reduce climate change is to make more people actually aware of the problem. Most of my interviewees were not aware of the scale of climate change and the “close” effects it will have on us (most feel like it does not directly affect them yet). So a solution is to actually SPEAK UP and advocate for this problem. We don’t want big corporations, much less the government...
Read more